Nate Berkopec on Twitter: "Best memory usage of a Rails app that I've ever seen was someone running 30 Puma processes with 6GB. That's 200 MB per process. This was a very
Learn by Benchmarking Ruby App Servers Badly — Engineering Blog
Why to use PUMA in production for your Rails App - DEV Community
Puma vs Unicorn vs Passenger: Ruby App Servers Compared | Scout APM Blog
How PUMA Contributes To the Production of Rails App – Josh Software
🗜Reducing Rails Memory Usage by ~15% | by Christian Gregg | Medium
memory - Puma not outperforming Unicorn (Rails 5.0 app) - is this normal? - Stack Overflow
Unicorn vs Puma: Rails server benchmarks
Why puma workers constantly hung, and how we fixed by discovering the bug of Ruby v2.5.8 and v2.6.6 | by Yohei Yoshimuta | ITNEXT
Puma: A Ruby/Rack Web Server Built for Parallelism
DriftingRuby on Twitter: "It took a bit of work, but got Ruby on Rails running on the ARM. Basically, needed to compile node from source and then install yarn, use the github
Memory usage keeps going up over time · Issue #342 · puma/puma · GitHub
🗜Reducing Rails Memory Usage by ~15% | by Christian Gregg | Medium
ruby on rails - Memory is not getting released after use In Puma Docker Container - Stack Overflow
🗜Reducing Rails Memory Usage by ~15% | by Christian Gregg | Medium
Puma vs Phusion Passenger : r/rails
Rails Benchmarking: Puma and MultiProcess — Engineering Blog
A Simpler Rails Benchmark, Puma and Concurrency — Engineering Blog
Unicorn vs Puma: Rails server benchmarks
Configuring Puma, Unicorn and Passenger for Maximum Efficiency